TURKEY |
|
| |
General
Principles |
|
| |
Foreigner’s Rights |
|
|
| |
Real Property Acquisition |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW

The
first Constitution was enacted in 1876 before establishing
The Republic Of Turkey. The era of “National Liberation”
is a most interesting period in Turkey’s constitutional
history and full of constitutional innovations.
In
this period, The Grand National Assembly enacted a Constitution
in 1921. This was a short but very important document
with 23 articles. For the first time, it proclaimed
the principle of “national sovereignty”
calling itself the “only and true representative
of the nation”. Legislative and executive powers
were vested in the Assembly, as they had been since
the opening of the Assembly on 23 April 1920. The sultanate
was abolished after the final victory at the “War
of Independence” and the Republic was officially
proclaimed on 29 October 1929.
Since
the Constitution of 1921 was not meant to be a constitution
in a full sense of the world; rather, it was a document
dealing only with the most urgent constitutional problems
of the moment, The Turkish Republic clearly needed a
new Constituiton.
So,
the new Constitution adopted by the Grand National Assembly
in 1924 retained most of the basic principles of the
1921 Constitution, notably the principle of national
sovereignty. Theoretically, both legistative and executive
powers were concentrated in the Assembly, but the Assembly
was to exercise its executive authority through the
Presedent of the Republic elected by it and a Council
of Ministers appointed by the Presedent. The Assembly
could at any time control the Council of Ministers and
dismiss it, while the Council had no power to dissolve
the Assembly to hold new elections.The Constitution
of 1924 was undoubtedly a democratic constitution in
spirit. But this was a “majoritarian” or
“Rousseauist” concept of democracy, than
a “liberal” democracy based on an intricate
system of checks and balanced.
Lack
of constitutional checks and balances did not pose a
major problem during the single-party years, since a
single a single-party system itself implies a heavy
concentration of governmental authority. But, with the
transition to a multy-party system in 1946, the weakness
of the Constitution became obvious. In the late 1950’s,
tension increased greatly between the governing Democrats
and the opposite Republicans. Finally, on 27 May 1960,
units of the Turkish Armed forces overthrew the Menderes
government.
The
Constitution 1961 was prepared and adopted by the Constituent
Assembly and finally came into force after being ratified
by popular vote on 9 July 1961. In many respects, the
Constitution of 1961 represented a reaction to the severe
problems observed in the functioning of the 1924 Constitution.
Clearly, the new Constitution was inspired by a pluralistic
, rather than a majoritarian , concept of democracy.
Instead of a constitutional structure based on an omnipotent
legislative assembly, a system of checks and balances
was introduced and powerful guarantees for minority
rights were provided.
In
spide of several amendments in 1971 and 1973, towards
the end of the 1970’s, the Turkish political system
faced an increasingly serious crisis brought about by
political polarization, violence and terrorism. This
instabilty led to the military takeover of 12 September
1980, which created a “National Security Council”
headed by Kenan Evren, then the chief of the General
Staff. The Counstituent Assembly prepared a new Constitution
and a referendum took place in 1982.
Just
as the 1961 Constitution was a reaction to a cetain
problems encountered by its predecessor, so is the 1982
Constitution. The framers of the 1982 Constitution approached
their task with the assumption that the political crisis
of the 1970’s was due to the erosion of the state
authority and more, specifically, to the weakness of
the executive branch. This, in turn, was attributed
to what was perceived as the excessive permissiveness
of the 1961 Constitution and its equally excessive limitations
on the exercises of the executive authority. The underlying
objective of the framers of the Contitution was, therefore,
a “strong state and strong executive”. Almost
every single departure of the 1982 Constitution from
its predecessor can be construed in these terms.
The
Constitution stipulates that the Republic of Turkey
is committed to Atatürk nationalism. The democratic
character of the Republic is stated in many articles.
Besides, the Constitution recognizes all basic human
rights commonly found in liberal democratic constitutions,
such as freedoms of speech, press, religion, assosiation,
assembly, travel and communications, right to property
and so on. The Constitution, like its predecessors,
retained the Kemalist notion of secularism. And also,
it is stated again the “rule of law” or
“supremacy of law” principle which signifies
a system where governmental agencies must operate within
the framework of law and their actions are subject to
review by independent judicial authorities.
|